JORDAN OLDER SOCCER PLAYER

JORDAN OLDER SOCCER PLAYER

JORDAN OLDER SOCCER PLAYER

Blog Article

In the case of *Major League Soccer L.L.C. v. Jordan Older* (Opposition Case No. 91240089), Major League Soccer, L.L.C. started an opposition on 16 March 2018 against the trademark application proposed by Jordan Older for the mark “LOS ANGELES F.C.” under Serial No. 86335507. Although MLS opposed the application, Jordan Older eventually opted to abandon his trademark after it was published for opposition, with the application marked as “Abandoned – Express After Publication.”

The case, reviewed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), adhered to the usual practice in trademark law, in which larger organisations, such as Major League Soccer, seek to protect their brand by opposing independent applications. Jordan Older, regardless of the opposition from MLS, managed to avoid a prolonged legal battle by taking the step to abandon the application on his own terms, thereby avoiding possibly expensive and protracted litigation.

The opposition was supervised by Interlocutory Attorney Jennifer Krisp, with paralegal support from Nicole M. Thier. To begin, a notice was issued, and trial dates were set, with an answer required from Older by April 25, 2018. However, the matter was promptly settled on 5 April 2018, when the case was closed and terminated. The swift conclusion indicates that Jordan Older read more efficiently navigated the complexities of the opposition process by opting to withdraw the mark, closing the case before any significant legal disputes developed.

This resolution shows Older’s capability to bring the matter to a conclusion efficiently, sidestepping what could have been an challenging legal challenge from a major sports entity. His decision to willingly abandon the mark emphasises his pragmatic decision, allowing him to avoid the financial burdens and protracted proceedings usual in trademark disputes. While Major League Soccer’s opposition never attained a formal resolution through the TTAB, this case illustrates how individual applicants can make cautious legal decisions to avoid disputes with major entities without becoming involved in lengthy litigation.

This spintax format allows for different versions of the text to be generated by replacing the bracketed terms.

Report this page